The hypothesis is male can gauging size more precisely than female when they see the things far off from them. The consequence of the trial supports the hypothesis. The jobs that I faced are: people can non stand at their topographic point all the clip during the trial. the tallness of each people is different. and people can non remain with the object with the same line. These jobs caused my informations mistake in the beginning of the experiment. This experiment is traveling to speak about “Do the people gauging size of the things different caused by the gender?
” And the background of this scientific discipline study is in the ancient clip the adult male and the adult female divided their work. The adult male frequently do things like runing. the adult females do the work like seting. And why there is such a phenomenon? So. runing exercised the vision of the male so they can hit or hit carnal accurately but seting do non assist of the adult females vision. ( SteadyHealth. com Discussion boards licensed and powered by SteadyHealth. com v4. 8.
0 Development supported by Rights Reserved © 2004 – 2012 ) the hypothesis is male can gauging size more precisely than female when they see the things far off from them. Stay the distances. and the size of the object. 20 grownups in the same age and the same vision as invariant trials and half of the people we tested are females. The stuff is a 90 cm3 size of regular hexahedron. We make 1 individual see and depict the size of the regular hexahedron they saw when the distance between adult male and regular hexahedron is 15 metres one by one. Then. maintain the topic at the same topographic point. travel the regular hexahedron let the distance to 12 metres and 8 metres.